59.9Average adult lifespan (yrs)
64Median adult lifespan (yrs)
87Surnames with enough data
21.8Yr gap, longest vs shortest

The first attempt at this ran into an obvious trap: family lines with a lot of descendants who emigrated to Chicago looked dramatically longer-lived than everyone else — the "Rich" line (the Chicago-Americanized branch of Riccio) topped the list at a 73-year average, well clear of anyone else. But that's not a family trait. Most of that line lived their adult lives in 20th-century America with modern medicine and sanitation, not 18th- or 19th-century Sassano. Comparing that fairly against families who stayed in Italy for centuries isn't measuring genetics — it's measuring which families happened to catch a later, healthier era.

So the numbers below exclude anyone with a Chicago or Illinois connection entirely, comparing only people who lived and died in and around Sassano itself, and only counting adults — deaths at 15 or older, since infant and child mortality reflects a different set of causes than adult longevity does. Only surnames with at least 20 qualifying adult deaths are included, so a family of three isn't skewing the picture.

Against a baseline adult average of 59.6 years (median 63), the longest-lived line remains Miele at a 72.4-year average, backed by 30 qualifying adults. Delisa, Martucci, and Stavola round out the rest of the top five, with di Stefano now tied with Stavola at 65.7. The shortest-lived is still Battista, though its average ticked up slightly to 50.6 years as more records came in; Gruccio, Baialardo, di Lorenzo, and Orlando follow close behind. The gap between the top and bottom of the list has narrowed a bit from the last update, from just over 23 years to just under 22 — a reminder that these rankings, especially near the bottom, can still move as the tree grows.

A confound worth flagging
"Most of the 'Rich' line has a Chicago record — its apparent longevity is an era effect, not a family one."
Excluded from the ranking below for exactly that reason
Sassano-only · adults 15+ · n≥20

The 15 longest-lived family lines.

# Surname Avg. Age at Death Median Sample Size
1Miele72.47530
2Delisa70.27644
3Martucci66.87257
4Stavola65.970221
5Pizzi65.77043
6Caporrino65.57039
7di Stefano63.87224
8Giordano63.46957
9Abbatemarco63.367123
10Setaro63.366130
11Biancamano63.168145
12Latella62.96729
13d'Alessio62.868324
14Arenare62.66945
15Rubino62.067224
Sassano-only · adults 15+ · n≥20

The 15 shortest-lived family lines.

# Surname Avg. Age at Death Median Sample Size
1Curcio49.25223
2Truglio50.34923
3Battista51.25444
4Baialardo51.85846
5di Lorenzo52.75842
6Gruccio52.95457
7Orlando53.15551
8Bellezza53.75831
9Barbella54.05347
10Picone54.15432
11Frabasile54.26030
12Vasquez54.25660
13Petriello54.65837
14Cecere54.86040
15Ricciardone54.95676
A separate, harder question

Families with the highest child mortality.

This is a different measure entirely — average lifespan including infant and child deaths, which mostly reflects disease and circumstance rather than adult longevity. Several lines show a median age at death in single digits, meaning more than half the recorded deaths in that surname were children. This table was recomputed against the current tree using the same transparent method as the rest of this page (surnames with 20+ recorded lifespans); the previous version of this table used an older, undocumented methodology that couldn't be reconciled with the current data, so treat any comparison to a prior visit to this page with that in mind.

# Surname Avg. Age at Death (all ages) Median Sample Size Died Under Age 5
1Camposano24.45.54048%
2Crisci24.833754%
3Curcio25.7144639%
4Caiafa26.0810749%
5Frabasile26.766349%
6Sofia26.74.52650%
7Battista26.8158745%
8Vasquez27.41112343%
9di Lorenzo27.5108740%
10Abbondanza27.54.54450%
11Tramutola27.811.56841%
12Lombardo27.8122829%
13Bellezza28.3126335%
14Cecere28.814.58038%
15Chirichella29.8152343%

This table isn't restricted to Sassano-only records the way the two above are, since child mortality patterns are less likely to be confounded by the same era-of-emigration effect. Treat it as a starting point for which lines had the hardest time historically, not a genetic finding.

Sample sizes here are modest, and a handful of unlucky or lucky decades can shift a surname's average by several years. This is a reasonable first look at where to focus further research — not a conclusion about any family's health or genetics. As always, if you spot a name or record that looks off, let me know.
Want to explore the underlying data yourself? See the Sassano–Chicago Pedigree Tree, the full 26,878-individual RootsMagic tree this analysis is drawn from.